Saturday, February 27, 2010

Another random find

Found this while trolling for links and stuff.

I'm still not sure what to think of it; I can't seem to find much on the singer, or this video. It seems like he was a good Russian singer, and he's probably lip syncing to himself in the video.

I'll update when/if I can find some more information.


Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Audio Commentary

I don't think that all of these are all exactly as complex, or "loaded" as some of the clips you showed, but they're just as cool.


For your consideration, I present :


"We are All Connected"
This is one of my favoirites, since I love the ideas it plays with, and its use of different "famous" personas. I also think the paralell between various scientist creatig a functioning whole from many unique parts mimics the way the universe works - one gigantic whole made from billons and billions of parts.

""We Are All Connected" was made from sampling Carl Sagan's Cosmos, The History Channel's Universe series, Richard Feynman's 1983 interviews, Neil deGrasse Tyson's cosmic sermon, and Bill Nye's Eyes of Nye Series, plus added visuals from The Elegant Universe (NOVA), Stephen Hawking's Universe, Cosmos, the Powers of 10, and more. It is a tribute to great minds of science, intended to spread scientific knowledge and philosophy through the medium of music."






Here is another world-traveling one : "Where The Hell Is Matt?"
I love the visuals of this one :)








Ghostbusters Multi-track.
(I just like how the final version sounds on this one. . .yeah, its a bit of a hack, but in my opinion, a nice-sounding one. And the video is pretty cool too!)






On the "strange instrument" track, check this out : The Megabass Waterphone





The Stop Sign Musical Compilation

Maybe another hack, but its fun to watch anyways.





Its required of me to include a cat-themed post.







Notes from end of class :

-"Harvested" vs. "Created"
-"Material Presence"
-"Real-Time" - tweaking, making, manipulating? Is "real-time" really REAL time?
-"Time" - both a cycle, and has life, death, implications as an aestetic.
-"Scale" - Be both an autonomous individual and universal, global action.
-"Democratic Moment" in time - democracy itself is part of the art education dialog.
-"

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Fishing for Links!

Doing some digging around online (dare I call it research?)



Best summation of my idea on why Mr. Stimpsons work is art :

"Lego is seriously one of the building blocks of life. We’ve got Carbon, we’ve got Hydrogen, and then we’ve got Lego. It should have it’s own atomic symbol and everything. There isn’t a single person I know who doesn’t have childhood memories of sitting on the living room floor building something out of Lego blocks."


http://shapeandcolour.wordpress.com/2008/04/01/mike-stimpson-classics-in-lego/

I buy that statement. I've got loads of legos at home, some of them still put together in sets, some sets still in pieces that I'll probably never get around to repairing and putting back together.


Take a basic building block like Lego, and mix it with iconic, maybe even defining moments of human history, and you've got a wonderfull work of art. A photograph can be viewed as a record of an event, and each moment a photograph captures is itself a small part of a bigger picture. For instance, the picture of a navy sailor kissing a nurse on VJ day is a mere snapshot of what happened worldwide that day. There were other events that happen across the globe on that day. The picture is only a record on two people, for less then one second, on that particular day. It is an important photo, but what it captures is only a small part of the happenings of the world on that day. That snippet of time is just like a tiny lego block - it is but a mere part of what happened on that day. The same can be said for the image in a cultural context. It is one of the first images that comes to mind when people think of VJ day; It is the defining visual moment that people associate with that day, and that event. Think of the power that world war two had, and all that happened. And people remember the end of it all by one single photograph. One photograph represents the end of years of war, hundreds of thousands of deaths, and the re-shaping of the "modern" world.

There are also other connections that can be made between real people and lego people. Lego people don't move; It takes human intervention for them to walk, talk, dance, drive, etc. Or, at least, no ones seen them do these things on their own. . .yet. . . .The same can almost be said of photography. Beautifull images exist all around us, all the time. The way someone leans over in front of a computer, or the way light filters through the window blinds as a cloud passes by. These images are fleeting and beautifull, but they don't exist, and can't be shown and shared unless someone actually takes the picture. The potential is there, but sometimes it all comes down to recording it for others to see.


I found some supposedly "better" versions by another photographer

http://www.cefvigo.com/galego/galeria_vilari%F1o.htm

I don't like them at all. Stimpson leves his lego figures in "standard" lego configuration; He doesn't change their proportion at all, and leaves them as Lego designed and built them. This guy sort of creates new lego figures that I don't like.

Here's a comparison.

Stimpson (whom I like)




Mr. Virlano (who I don't like)


And, just for yucks, the original Robert Cappa Photograph



Now, neither rendition in Lego looks particularly human. Neither lego "figure" turly captures the pose and the anguish that the spanish soldier is in as he falls. But what in the world happened to the guy in Mr. Virlanos photograph? His leg is angled with sharp points in it. His head has this wierd ear thingy on it, and his arms are totally out of lego proportion. Mr. Virlano doesn't follow the established traditions for rendering lego people. His person doesn't look lego, but hes way too blocky and shapeless to be human either. Its okay to use Legos, and the traditions and connotations that go along with it, like Mr. Stimpson does. But when you distory it like Mr. Virlano does, the only thing I think of is "Boy, that guy cheaped out and got lazy making a human figure." There's nothing that connects his use of lego with his photographic reproduction. As far as I can tell, he used lego cause it was cheap and easy, not because he actually WANTED to SPECIFICALLY use LEGO.

(SEGWAY - This is now making me think about different ways to render/show the human form, from classic painting, to these lego people, to XKCD's stick-figures, and on. . .it would be cool to curate an exhibit solely on different ways to render people. I'll post a blog entry on this alone tomorrow.)

-Traces/Tracing - the term of conbining meanings from two different cultures/subtexts, and the creation of a new meaning that calls upon an unerstanding of both subtexts to create a new text.

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Syllabus Changes

I'm noticing an interesting occurance about new media artists : Not all new media artists are "working" artists. Some of the new media videos/projects I've got bookmarked are one-off things; People do something good, post it, and thats it. They don't get gallery shows, or reviews in fancy magazines. Maybe its time to re-think the idea of what makes a professional artist?

Marks List of possible artists :


Playing For Change
http://playingforchange.com/journey/introduction

I first found this group through this youtube video, which was realy cool.



I like their ideas that music can be this universal worldwide tie-in that connects all people, and I think their project is particularly well-suited to new media, and the internet is continuing to spread worldwide and reach a larger and larger audience. Some of their work is also borderline doccumentary, giving musical artists/cultures a way to get recorded and archived for the future.


Eepy Birds
http://eepybird.com/

I remember hearing about these guys back when it became a fad to put mentos in diet coke and watch the rather explosive reaction that followed. Actually, these guys WERE the fad - they pretty much started its most recent incarnation. Anyone who can take a bottle of coke and a candy and make cool performance art from it is cool. Period.

(View video here)

http://revver.com/video/27335/extreme-diet-coke-mentos-experiments/

Their latest work has involved sticky notes, but I'm not sure they've really done much since. . .

Eepybird's Sticky Note Experiment from Eepybird on Vimeo.

From the creators of the Diet Coke and Mentos experiment, EepyBird show us how to have fun with sticky notes.


Mike Stimpson

http://www.redbubble.com/people/balakov


Mike makes re-creations of famoust artwork (mostly photographs) in lego.

I like these two, since they represent a range of complicated to simple renderings.
I love the idea of high art being rendered in a childrens play medium.








FEB 2
3 artists - your interest to : jhall@massart.edu
-Start collecting info on chosen artists

-Artists Name
-URL with their work
-Why did I pick the artist?

-Check out steve wilsons link list (from class babel page) - Good place to get ideas

FEB 9
(Probably a work day)
Research includes citations
1)Web resources
2)Massart Databases

Feb 16
-Present your artist

Like/Dislike

I'm not sure how I feel about this idea of replacing like/dislike with have access to / don't have access to.

As an artist, I understand that sometimes it takes time to develop ideas and connections, and "I don't like" can be a turnoff to understading a work (even if, in the end, you don't like it.)

But sometimes I just wanna scream @ an artwork because I just don't like it. I don't want art to become this culture where no one likes or dislikes anything. I don't want an audience of yes men (not the artistic movement/group, the plain old business kind of yes men). I want people to say that "I like this" and "I don't like this." I want people to go back to looking at art BECAUSE they like it. I hope they look at art they might not like for understanding, but art should be made because you like to make it and hope people like to look at it.

As art educators, I understand the need to avoid "I like / I Don't Like", but as artists, and viewers of art, sometimes I think its a dangerous road to head down.